Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

atomic: Extend support for custom execution policies #447

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

stotko
Copy link
Owner

@stotko stotko commented Nov 19, 2024

The load/store functions in atomic still use the legacy API for copying memory between host and device which, in turn, is fully synchronous. Although all containers received support for custom execution_policys, this support is complete due to the aforementioned limitation. Extend the support for atomic to address this issue.

Partially addresses #351

@stotko stotko added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Nov 19, 2024
@stotko stotko force-pushed the atomic_extended_execution_policy branch from 5601dfe to 9991ed8 Compare November 19, 2024 12:42
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 71.79487% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 97.17%. Comparing base (f51a985) to head (ae8acbb).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/stdgpu/openmp/impl/memory_detail.h 50.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
src/stdgpu/impl/memory_detail.h 54.54% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #447      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.56%   97.17%   -0.39%     
==========================================
  Files          32       33       +1     
  Lines        2585     2624      +39     
==========================================
+ Hits         2522     2550      +28     
- Misses         63       74      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@stotko stotko force-pushed the atomic_extended_execution_policy branch from 9991ed8 to ae8acbb Compare November 19, 2024 13:17
@stotko stotko merged commit 3cb7082 into master Nov 19, 2024
59 of 61 checks passed
@stotko stotko deleted the atomic_extended_execution_policy branch November 19, 2024 13:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant